Search:      Site      Web        
powered by
Del.icio.us | Digg | Print Article | E-Mail Article | Change Font Size
12 October 2007

Not rock ’n’ roll to me

Keith Richards once said that if you can’t hear Chuck Berry in it, it isn’t rock ’n’roll.

That’s always been a pretty good acid test to me. Besides, who wants to argue with Johnny Depp’s pirate dad?

Greatest anything lists are always good places to start a discussion if not a downright battle. There are few better ways to cause a bar brawl than to start talking about the best team in anything right up to and including tiddly-winks.

Taking that into consideration, what the heck was the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame thinking with its list of this year’s nominees?

They are: pop icon Madonna, Heartland rocker John Mellencamp, rappers Beastie Boys, dance acts Donna Summer and Chic, rap pioneer Afrika Bambaataa, poet/ songwriter Leonard Cohen, British Invasion band The Dave Clark Five and surf rock instrumentalists The Ventures.

Out of these, the 500 voting members of the HOF will choose five for induction.

Some of the choices seem obvious because the others have little to do with rock ’n’ roll music. Mellencamp, the Ventures and even the little remembered Dave Clark Five all have solid credentials.

Mellencamp has a string of hits as long as your arm. Every dance band in the mid-1960s had to know at least one Ventures song. Few may recall any hits by Clark and the quintet except “Glad All Over.” But in the heady days of the British Invasion, they were up on the crest with the Beatles and the Rolling Stones.

But Chic? That ain’t rock ’n’ roll.

The disco band’s guitarist Nile Rogers and bassist Bernard Edwards went on to become hugely successful and influential producers in funk, dance music and hip hop. I’ve even seen a video of Slash playing “Le Freak” with Chic.

That still doesn’t make them a rock band.

Donna Summer worked hard for her money but it was singing disco and pop.

There are many, many deserving rock bands that have been overlooked by the HOF.

Two fine examples, in my opinion, are the Monkees and a little Canadian trio called Rush.

Millions of kids grew up watching the Monkees. Musically, the band reflected many of the changes coming into music such as the rise of country rock and the use of synthesizers. The pre-fab four also used the show to introduce more avant garde artists such as Frank Zappa to a prime-time audience.

Former Monkee Mike Nesmith has also been honored as one of the pioneers of music videos. As far as Rush, well quite simply Geddy Lee, Neil Peart and Alex Lifeson are three of the finest musicians in rock. Even I can see that and I don’t even like their music.

Over a 30 year career, Rush has amassed a huge following for its heavy, yet cerebral sound. Songs such as “Tom Sawyer” and “New World Man” have become radio staples.

I have nothing against Donna Summer. The “Queen of Disco” has a wonderful voice and scored many a well-derserved hit on the dance charts. But the idea that the moan behind the disco hit “Love to Love You, Baby” may be in the HOF and not Rush makes me think the hall has lost its way.


See archived 'Columns' Stories »
 



Click to vote
Recommend this story?
Yes
No
The online vote: 4 1


Reader's comments




Concerning the Rock Hall, or Rolling Stone's Magazine Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. I always believed that The Monkees have been overlooked, as well as Rush. So it is nice to see someone else echo that. The Monkees pioneered the use of the music video form, and MTV should be thankful for that. However Rolling Stone Magazine co-founder and Rock Hall Ruler Jan Wenner hates the Monkees, so, as a fan, I will never see them get in. The same holds true for Rush, the ones who vote do not have a taste for Rush, so Rush won't get in. But do you really want to see them in Rolling Stone Magazine's Rock and Roll Hall of Fame?

Mike Harkins - Oct 19, 2007 12:54:11 PM Remove Comment

 
You mean the Schlock and Bore Hall of Shame is still around? The purpose of the Schlock and Bore is not to celebrate the best, it's to sell copies of greatest hits compilations from groups long past their sell-by date. If you disagree, remember that the Schlock and Bore committee consists of Rolling Stone management, reported payola takers, and the recording industry, reported payola payers. Then look in the record stores for the next three months, they will be full of rereleases and repackaging of old and tired material. Anyone who is important and influential in music has no chance of entering the Schlock and Bore unless a redistribution will sell well. There is no other reason for entrance or denial. If importance mattered, half of those in would not be there. Just to give one example, who has had more influence on music, Link Wray, or REM, and which of those two is in the Schlock and Bore Hall of Shame? The pronouncements of the Schlock and Bore do not deserve anyone's anger and attention. They deserve our derision and avoidance. We used to hate people Now we make fun of them It's more effective that way KMFDM, Dogma

K9 - Oct 16, 2007 03:43:46 PM Remove Comment

 
RUSH IS MY FAVORIT BAND. ALSO AS PEOPLE THEY SEEM TO BE VERY HUMBLE GUYS FROM WHAT IVE READ ABOUT THEM. I THINK THAT ITS PRETTY COOL THAT THEY ARE NOT IN THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME. THERE FANS DONT CARE ABOUT THAT STUFF ANYWAY.

JEFF ARNOLD - Oct 15, 2007 03:45:36 PM Remove Comment

 
You are wrong in so many ways about CHIC. They are easily the most influential, innovative and YES rock and roll band of them all.

pocat - Oct 14, 2007 11:29:12 AM Remove Comment

 
I could not agree more with you. The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame has become an outright joke with its ongoing selection of non rock entities for inclusion while continually being dismissive of Rush. If creating solid rock music for nearly 40 years or selling close to 40 million records worldwide or having more gold records than almost any other act or being viewed as some of the finest musicians in the business is not worth of a Hall of Fame then what is? Once again well written though I suspect it will fall of the deaf ears of those responsible for the Hall. John

John - Oct 12, 2007 06:03:39 PM Remove Comment
 

Add your comments
Please follow and enforce these guidelines:
1. No flaming. Do not be hostile.
2. No comments that are obscene, vulgar, lewd, sexually-oriented, threatening, libelous, or illegal.
3. No racial slurs or insults.
4. "Remove Comment" flags offensive comment for removal.

Verification Code:
Enter Verification:
Your Name:
Your Comment:
By submitting this form, you agree to this site's terms of service



Events Calendar
 What:  When:
 Where:
   AP Video